The Effects of Birth Order Essay -- Birth Human Behavior Personality E

Does birth order have an effect on personality? Does be first born make mint more responsible? If some hotshot is the middle born child, are they going to be more rebellious?If people are last born are they more likely to be on television? Are firstborn children inconsiderate and selfish or reliable and highly motivated? These, and many other questions are being thoroughly studied by psychologists(Harrigan, 1992). In 1923, the renowned psychiatrist Dr. Alfred Adler, wrotethat a persons get in the family leaves an undeniable stamp on hisor her style of life (Marzollo, 1990). Research has shown that birth orderdoes indeed affect a child however, it does not automatically shape personality.If it did, life would be much more predictable and a great deal less interesting(Marzollo, 1990). Yogi Bera, a far-famed baseball player, said Every now andthen a reporter who thinks he is Freud asks me if being the youngest is whyI made it (playing professional baseball). I al roughly always gr ade yes, butI dont think it had anything to do with it (Harrigan, 1992). Birth orderdoesnt explain everything about human behavior. Personality is affected bymany different factors, such(prenominal) as heredity, family size, the spacing and sexof siblings, education, and upbringing. However, there is an awful lot ofresearch and plain old law of averages supporting the affect of birth orderon personality (Leman, 1985). There are four basic classifications of birthorder the oldest, the only, the middle, and the youngest. Each has its own regulate of advantages, as well as its own set of disadvantages. While the birthorder factor isnt always exact, it does give many clues about why people arethe way they are (Leman, 1985).If there is one word that describes firstborn children it would be perfectionist (Harrigan, 1992). First born childrentend to be high achievers in whatever they do. Some traits customarily usedto tail first born children include reliable, conscientious, list maker, w ellorganized, critical, serious, scholarly (Leman, 1985), self-assured, good leadershipability, eager to please, and nurturing (Brazelton, 1994). Also, first bornchildren seem to have a heightened feel of right and wrong. It is commonin most books about birth order that first born children get more press thanonly, middle, and youngest children. This... ...ute as a loved little baby, but the next minuteshes compared unfavorably with an older sibling. He or she is often unfairlycompared with older and stronger siblings.According to Beverly Hills-basedpsychiatrist Carole Lieberman, M.D., the self-image of the youngest child whitethornbecome confused (Lanning, 1991). As a result of conflicting experiences,youngest children can be extremely self-confident in someways and insecurein others (Leman, 1985). For the most part, youngest children learn to copewith the problems of self-doubt. In fact, youngest children often go on tobecome quite successful, thanks in part to their originality and determinationto prove themselves to the world (Lanning, 1991). Often, they get theirunique view of the world through the visual or literary arts. People-pleasingfields, such as art, comedy, entertainment and sales are full of youngest children(Lanning, 1991). Some examples of famous youngest children include RonaldReagan (president, actor), Eddie Murphy (comedian), Paul Newman (actor), MaryLou Retton (gymnast), Billy Crystal (comedian), Yogi Bera (baseball player),Ted Kennedy (politician), and Kevin Leman (psychologist)

Essay --

Chapter 1Introduction1.1 Introduction One of the most special K ways for a firm to operate or finances its assets is swell structure. Capital structures refer as a combination of equity, debt and hybrid securities that used in the firm operation. In a perfect market, transaction or bankruptcy monetary value, inefficient information and taxes will not exist. Therefore, Modigliani and Miller created a theory of capital structure in a perfect market. The use of capital structure is important as it affect the firm profitability. Financial decision of a military control organization becomes one of the important decisions that normally will represent by capital structure. Musiega, et al. (2013) claimed that choosing an appropriate capital structure will benefit the firm as it help a firm to adapt with various challenging and competitive business world thereby become more profitability. According to Zeitun and Tian (2007), managers who are fitting to identify the optimal capital structu re will help the companies to increase the firm revenue or profitability and reduce the firms cost of finance. Nutshell, capital structure of a firm can influence a firm profitability a firm health determined by a firm capital structure. By analyzing the choice of firms capital structure, financial behavior of a firm can be explained by the pecking aver theory and the trade off theory (Ana, Dragan & Monica, 2012). Both of this theory provides a different relationship between the capital structure and profitability. Based on the take of Zabri (2012), the pecking say theory provide a negative impact of profitability on leverage while the trade-off theory provide a unconditional relationship between the capital structure and profitability. There are some of the findings... ...o investigate the relationship between the capital structure and profitability of firm. In order to have clearer and accurate evidence on the relationship between the capital structure and profitability, 24 o f public listed companies in Sarawak Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE), Malaysia are elect to test it. All the financial statement for 24 companies will record accurate and correctly in order to create an accurate test or relationship. The introduction of the research proposal will be discussed in chapter 1. In chapter 2, literature review will be discussed on various views of previous researches which occupy to our topic. Research methodology and the data collection will be present in chapter 3 while chapter 4 will discuss about the depart and discussion on the result. A conclusion and policy implication will be discussed in the final chapter of this study.

Medieval Europe And The Renaissance :: essays research papers

When I look at the conflicts that chivalric European people faced and the conflicts that modern people face, I see a large difference. Our government, economicals, science, mobility, art, literacy and health are very different. Some aspects of religion are different, provided not many. The Black Death and feudalism are some major contri neverthelessions to the medieval times. The Black Death is known as a beneficial divider between the central and Middle Ages. The changes are numerous. They include the introduction of gunpowder, importance of cities, economic and demographic crises, and powerful new currents in culture and religion. Overall, the late middle ages were characterized as a period of chaos. The Black Death did not cause the chaos, but the plague definitely contributed towards it, as well as making more problems. The Black Death erupted in the Gobi desert in the late 1320s. There is no real explanation why. The plague bacillus was alive and active long before that. Eu rope had suffered from an epidemic in the 6th century. But the disease became comparatively dormant in the following centuries. It is said that it was due to the climate beginning to cool in the 14th century. Whatever it was, the outbreak began and spread fast. It mostly went west, but it spread everywhere. The Asian nations suffered greatly as anywhere. In China, the population dropped from 125 million to 90 million. The plague was so widespread it was said that there was not enough living to bury the dead. Rodents ran the un hale streets that carried the fleas that had the disease. This is how the Bubonic hatred was spread. The people believed at the time that the gods were punishing them for things they had done wrong in the past. The Bubonic Plague is transmitted either though an infected rodent (rats, rabbits, etc.) carrying bugs (fleas). It was first thought that the rats themselves transmitted the Bubonic Plague because when people found dead rats in the towns streets, they would ordinarily flee their civilization in fear of the rodents. But it was observed that people would only get the disease if they came in contact with a rodent or rat that was dead for a short amount of time. The Bubonic Plague is not very common these days, but that is because we live in the United States where our sanitary level is fairly high. But in Africa, Asia, and South America, several people die from it every year.